A2UI vs MCP-UI: Understanding the Protocol Landscape
A technical comparison of A2UI and MCP-UI protocols. Learn the key differences in architecture, security model, and use cases to choose the right protocol for your AI application.
TL;DR: MCP handles context (what the AI knows). A2UI handles presentation (what the user sees). They’re complementary, not competing.
[!NOTE] December 2025 Update: MCP has been donated to the Linux Foundation’s Agentic AI Foundation (AAIF), further solidifying its role as the industry standard for agent context.
The Confusion
With multiple “AI protocols” emerging in 2024-2025, developers are understandably confused. This article clarifies the landscape.
Protocol Overview
| Feature | A2UI | MCP (Model Context Protocol) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Purpose | UI Rendering | Context Injection |
| Data Flow | Agent → User | Data Sources → Agent |
| Output | Visual Components | Text/Structured Data |
| Security Focus | Prevent UI injection | Authorize data access |
When to Use A2UI
A2UI shines when your agent needs to show something to the user beyond plain text:
- Rich Data Display: Flight cards, restaurant listings, product catalogs.
- Interactive Forms: Dynamic surveys, booking flows, multi-step wizards.
- Data Visualization: Charts, maps, dashboards.
{
"type": "flight-card",
"props": {
"airline": "TechAir",
"departure": "SFO",
"arrival": "NRT",
"price": 1250
}
}
When to Use MCP
MCP excels when your agent needs to know something:
- Database Access: Query your PostgreSQL, Supabase, or Firebase.
- File System: Read local documents, CSVs, PDFs.
- API Integration: Connect to Salesforce, Jira, Notion.
The Synergy: Using Both Together
The most powerful agentic applications use both protocols:
[User Query] → [MCP: Fetch Data] → [LLM: Reason] → [A2UI: Render UI]
Example Flow:
- User asks: “Show me my upcoming flights.”
- MCP fetches flight data from the user’s calendar and airline API.
- LLM processes and prioritizes the results.
- A2UI renders a beautiful
<FlightList />component.
Security Model Comparison
A2UI: “Vending Machine” Approach
- The client pre-registers allowed components.
- The agent can only request from the approved menu.
- Result: Zero risk of arbitrary code execution.
MCP: “Gated Access” Approach
- Each data source has explicit permissions.
- The user authorizes which sources the agent can access.
- Result: Controlled data exposure.
Conclusion
Don’t choose between A2UI and MCP. Choose both for a complete agentic stack:
| Layer | Protocol |
|---|---|
| Context (Input) | MCP |
| Presentation (Output) | A2UI |
Learn More
- MCP Joins Linux Foundation: A New Era for AI Agent Protocol Ecosystem
- A2UI 2026 Roadmap: When Will React Support Arrive?
- Security Deep Dive